Ulysses Grant Biography - 18th U.S. President

Essay on The Similarities Between Mason and Madison

Throughout American history, many individuals have made reforms to the government. However, significant actions done by George Mason and James Madison still impact society today with the Bill of Rights and the implementation of a ‘check and balance’ government system. George Mason and James Madison were both influential figures in the creation of the United States’ government structure with their oppositions to prejudiced governments. George Mason, a figure in American History who strongly advocated for individual freedoms and rights, strongly opposed the unjust actions committed by the British Parliament. The British government had been passing Acts against the will of the colonists, and Mason was upset by these actions. â€Å"that†¦show more content†¦Ã¢â‚¬Å"Hence it is that such democracies have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths.† Madison says this because he believed that all people act according to their own local situations. According to Madison, people act in the name of their own selfish reasons, instead of considering the broader greater good. Thus, states should not be trusted to be the strongest part of the government, and factions should not be trusted with the majority of the power, either. George Mason strongly opposed Madison’s idea of a new national government. Mason thought that a federal government was unfair because it left less individual and state rights. His ideal government was one with a weak central government - the opposite of Madison’s. Mason preferred this, because when the central government is weak, the states assume most of the governmental power. Mason was an anti-federalist, and he was important in the process of the addition of the Bill of Rights, which secured individual rights and gave more authority to States. Madison, a federalist, eventuallyShow MoreRelatedConf ederation and Constitution1594 Words   |  7 Pagesplace. The Articles of Confederation led to the Constitution of the United States. Although similar in some aspects, very different in others. The articles had many weaknesses that were changed in the Constitution. There were many compromises made between the states in order to effectively draft the Constitution. Roger Sherman’s Plan kept the Constitutional Convention together which was later known as the Great Compromise. The fight for the Constitution had just begun and the ratification processesRead MoreUnited States Vs. Virginia Constitution. In A Quick Observation,1115 Words   |  5 PagesVirginia Constitution In a quick observation, it may be easy to observe that the Constitution of Virginia is much larger in length and detail than the United States Constitution. There are many differences between these two constitutions besides the authors or contributors being that James Madison contributed to both, however, he was not the complete author of the Constitution of Virginia (Constitutions of Virginia). Both Constitutions have the same idea in which it holds three separate branches ofRead MoreDecisions Of Philadelphi The Constitutional Convention Of 17871919 Words   |  8 Pagesthat were going to attend the meetings for the Constitutional Convention and declare speeches. Four of the main men were James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, William Patterson, and Charles Pinckney. All of these men had very different plans of government. James Madison was very anxious about the Constitutional Convention and came with what he knew and believed in. Madison believed in the â€Å"Vices of the Political System.† This paper discussed Madison’s thoughts and what he believed was the problems inRead MoreThe Mask Of Chivalry : The Making Of The Second Ku Klux Klan1706 Words   |  7 PagesMaclean. At the time of the book’s publication in 1994, she was an Associate Professor of History at Northeastern University. The book is a revision of her dissertation she wrote to achieve her doctoral degree at the University of Washington at madison. At that time in 1889, the long paper was titled, â€Å"Behind the Mask of Chivalry: Gender, Race, and Class in the Making of the Ku Klux Klan of the 1920s in Georgia†. She is currently Arts and Sciences Professor of History at Duke University. At DukeRead MoreThe Study of the Attachment by Harry Harlow and Mary Ainsworth2075 Words   |  9 Pagesphase-sensitive learning that occurs at after born age or a particular life stage, that is rapid and apparently independent of the consequences of behaviour, where animals learn to follow their caregivers, â€Å"Imprinting† is the factor that creates a bound between them. In a very similar direction we found a important contribution by John Bowlby research, proposition that human infants possess inbuilt or innate tendencies to form emotionally and bound to caregivers (Bowlby, 1953). On the PsychoanalysisRead MoreLeadership Styles As A Public Administrator Essay2232 Words   |  9 Pagescharismatic leaders focuses on their abilities to connect with people. Both Bonaparte and Peron understood the needs of those underneath them, and both were dynamic speakers who could explain how and why their followers needed to take action. Another similarity, both Bonaparte and Peron came from humble beginnings, and both eventually moved into very high positions, adored by their followers. The contrast in these leaders was the significant ego that led to Bonaparte’s downfall, was apparently in contrastRead MoreEssay about Public Display of Religious Garments3102 Words   |  13 PagesAmendment of the Constitution. The amendment states, â€Å"Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof5.† But the Supreme Court has established precedents for many cases regarding clashes between the Establishment Clause and military conduct6. The United States military has not been blind to the issue of religious or cultural expression. The Department of Defense issued a rule that states, â€Å"Requests for accommodation of religious practicesRead MoreShah Jahan and His Architectural Contribution to India5907 Words   |  24 PagesBernier to write many things about this princess, founded entirely on the talk of low people. Therefore it is incumbent on me, begging his pardon, to say that what he writes is untrue.† It is certain that the story about the unpleasant relationship between Shah Jahan and his daughter is has its root from a rumor. However, the reason behind the birth of this rumor amongst ‘low people’ is unknown to us. Thus, it is not possible to arrive at any clear conclusion regarding this view. Shah Jahan was theRead MorePostmodernism in Literature5514 Words   |  23 Pagesquest. This distrust of totalizing mechanisms extends even to the author; thus postmodern writers often celebrate chance over craft and employ metafiction to undermine the authors univocal control (the control of only one voice). The distinction between high and low culture is also attacked with the employment of pastiche, the combination of multiple cultural elements including subjects and genres not previously deemed fit for literature. A list of postmodern authors often varies; the following areRead MoreStephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Judge (2011) Organizational Behaviour 15th Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall393164 Words   |  1573 PagesPerception? 166 Factors That Influence Perception 167 165 Person Perception: Making Judgments About Others 168 Attribution Theory 168 †¢ Common Shortcuts in Judging Others 170 †¢ Specific Applications of Shortcuts in Organizations 173 The Link Between Perception and Individual Decision Making 174 Decision Making in Organizations 175 The Rational Model, Bounded Rationality, and Intuition 175 †¢ Common Biases and Errors in Decision Making 177 Influences on Decision Making: Individual Differences and

Characters in Othello Colors and Shapes Free Essays

The color and shape I chose for Othello are silver and the indifferent shape. I thought about it for a while and this indifferent shape fits othello perfectly for many reasons. Like Othello this is the outsider of the group since it has no real shape. We will write a custom essay sample on Characters in Othello: Colors and Shapes or any similar topic only for you Order Now The shape’s physical appearance is different from the rest, just like Othello is since he’s a moor and has a different skin tone. Towards the end of the third act Othello starts to lose his stern confidence front and his real insecurities come out. He shows that he feels not confined and proper enough for the whites. Also his age is another big insecurity that he feels when Desdemona’s faithfulness is in question. This relates to the indifferent shape of the group trying to front like its a shape when really it’s not. Silver best describes Othello with the following characteristics honorable, chivalrous,and romantic. These are displayed when Othello woo’s desdemona with his story and by his high ranking in the venetian army. I chose lavender, pink, and a circle to represent Desdemona’s character. Desdemona represents perfection in the story with her looks and appearance. This is why the circle with no rough edges and a perfectly drawn out figure fits Desdemona perfectly. Desdemona is completely the opposite of Othello she comes from a prominent and perfect family. While Othello has grown up with no silver spoon, (even thou ironically thats his color), he was raised into slavery and the army. These trials and tragedies Othello overcame shaped him into the shape he is. Also like the inside of the circle Desdemona’s character lacks depth and seems somewhat empty. Some character traits Desdemona does display are affection for Othello when his life story moves her to the point of tears. She shows compassion by saying she will do whatever her lover asks of her and simply cannot say no to him. She also comes off as a romantic when she disobeys her father to be with her lover and runs off. The shapes and colors that best go with Cassio are yellow and a triangle. Cassio is a triangle in my opinion because he has a high stature which means everything to him. Like the stature of an equilateral triangle in math and if the triangle loses one angle it messes up the whole triangle. This is sort of like how Cassio messed up once in Othello’s eyes and lost everything. Yellow best fits Cassios’s character which is happy go lucky flirt. He was optimistic throughout the whole story and was very people orientated, maybe even too much. this was his biggest character flaw and his downfall thanks to Iago’s evil scheming. Iago is the most evil character in the play hands down, but he might also be the smartest. I chose dark blue, black, and a square to represent him. Black is the color that represents evil which Iago is for turing everyone against each other and making evil conniving plans behind there back. Just because he’s evil doesn’t mean he’s not smart. Iago is very intelligent he single handedly played everyone. Like a square Iago seems things from every angle (front back and side to side) and has full vision. So dark blue which means intelligent, responsible, and self reliant seemingly fits him. If I had to pick colors and a shape to represent me I would choose the same shape as Othello, beige and mint green. Although I didn’t choose the same shape as Othello for the same reasons. My reasoning behind my choice for that shape are I don’t really ever plan much out, I bend and just go with the flow. Also this shape is different from the rest and thats how I see myself, different from the rest. My colors represent me an the way I am which is more quiet and laid back than most people. These colors also fit my personality. Which I consider kind hearted and quiet even though I cant always make everyone happy I always try. How to cite Characters in Othello: Colors and Shapes, Essay examples

Case Study of Horne v Queensland-Free-Samples-Myassignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Case Study of Horne v Queensland. Answer: Horne v Queensland [1995] Representing the plaintiff in this case Facts of the case The plaintiff, Yvette Sonja Horne, was 13 years old on 11 December 198, when she suffered serious injuries in the lower part of her body as she fell off her bicycle on the road in front of the rear wheels of a large semi-trailer that passed across her lower part of the body. She was riding on a bicycle, from her Aspley State High School to the Cooper Tennis courts that was located at some distance from the school, when she met with the accident. The State of Queensland is the first defendant; the driver who was driving the trailer, Lyall Norman Boettcher, was the second defendant and the owner of the large semi-trailer, Finney Bryce transport Pty Ltd was the third defendant in the case. The State of Queensland is subject to legal proceedings on the ground that it failed to exhibit reasonable care and was negligent towards the children under the responsibility of Aspley State High School (Foley and Christensen 2016). The school was negligent in allowing the children including the plaintiff to ride a bicycle to the Tennis courts because the road that pupils required to travel posed a danger to the cyclists of plaintiffs age, in particular owing to the heavy traffic on that road. Issue Whether the Aspley State High School breached duty of care Whether plaintiff was contributory negligent Whether the driver and the owner of the semi-trailer liable for negligence Arguments of the plaintiff The plaintiff contended that the driver of the semi-trailer was negligent as he failed to stop the vehicle even after he noticed that the plaintiff was riding the bicycle downward in front of his vehicle. Even the prime mover of the vehicle and the entire attached semi-trailer had passed the plaintiff safely before she actually fell off the bicycle in front of the rear wheels of the semi-trailer. The plaintiff further stated that there was evidence with respect to the negligence on part of the school, the fist defendant, as the school authority failed to take reasonable care and precautions to ensure that the children, especially children of plaintiffs age did not ride bicycles from school to the Tennis courts as the road they needed o travel posed danger for the children (Chase and Miller 2016). The plaintiff further contended that the mother of the plaintiff was assured by the school authority that children going to the tennis courts would travel in a group with a teacher or under the supervision of the teacher or any other authorized person of the school. On the day of incident, the first defendant told the students to make their own way to the tennis courts and their roll call shall be called at courts (Brake 2014). The friend of the plaintiff, Connie Miles, suggested the plaintiff to use a bicycle left at the school by another girl and ride to the courts. The plaintiff contended that as she proceeded down the hill behind her friend she saw the prime mover and semi-trailer as it was overtaking them. The plaintiff realized the default in the braking system of the bicycle and collided with her friends bicycle. She flung off her bicycle under the wheels of trailer. The plaintiff stated that she faced difficulty while controlling the bicycle just before the collision (Abraham 2017). Arguments of the defendant The second defendant stated that the plaintiff had noticed the semi-trailer when it was about two meters from her bicycle. He stated that he heard a slight noise and when he glanced in his rear vision mirror; he saw the plaintiff and her bicycle going under the back of the trailer. He stopped the vehicle and provided necessary assistance to the plaintiff and her friend. The second defendant contended that the drivers side wheels of the prime mover and semi-trailer were very close to the white line in Beams road that segregated the traffic travelling towards Gympie road. The second defendant stated that he saw two children riding bicycles in the front and he observed that the bicycle of the plaintiff was unstable or unsteady as the bicycle was too big for the plaintiff and that there was no indication that the plaintiff would swerve to her right more than 1.7 meters as the vehicle was proceeding past the plaintiff extending 2.4 metres from the centre line (Ryan, Callaghan and Large 2015). Judgment of the Trial court After perusing the contentions of both the parties to the suit, the court based its judgment on the following reasons. Firstly, the court considered that since the accident had taken place long ago, more than 9 years ago, therefore the court treated the reliability of the plaintiffs and her friends recollection relating to the cause of the injury with some reservation. Secondly, with respect to the issue relating to the fact whether the first defendant was liable for committing negligence against the plaintiff, the court considered the fact that the Aspley High School was accountable for ensuring that children are lead to the Tennis court under the supervision of any teacher or any authorized person. Apparently, on enquiring about the travelling that was to take place from school to the Tennis court, the mother of the plaintiff was assured that the children shall be led by a group of children under the supervision of the teacher. Thirdly, as per the contention made by the defendant that the bicycle was too big for the plaintiff and that it was unstable owing to the default in the braking system of the bicycle, the court preferred to rely on the evidence provided by the police officers relating to the condition of the bicycle and the evidence relating to the facts about the occurrence of the accident that was recorded by the police after interviewing the plaintiff, her girlfriend and the defendants (Spamann 2016). The court relied upon the evidence of the police officer under section 18 and 101 of the Evidence Act. Fourthly, in regards to the negligence alleged against the second and third defendant, the court accepted the fact that Beams road was a dangerous road especially or people riding bicycles after the fact were investigated by constable. The court did not accept the fact that the second and third defendant failed to exhibit reasonable precautions and care to avert the injury that was caused to the plaintiff (Hill 2015). The court based this statement on the evidence that while passing the plaintiff and her friend the side wheels of the prime mover and semi-trailer were very close. The distance between the plaintiff and her friend and the prime mover was a distance of 4.2 metre and the trailer being 8 ft wide, the court asserted that, the second and third defendant could not be said to be negligent. Further, the court accepted the contention of the second defendant that there is no further evidence that the second defendant was rash driving or travelling at a fast speed. Fifthly, with respect to the issue whether the first defendant was negligent for breaching a duty of care that it owed to the plaintiff being a student of the Aspley State High school, the court is of the opinion that the school authorities were liable for committing a breach of the duty of care by permitting the plaintiff to travel from school to the court during the time she was under the authority of the school. The school was aware of the location of both Aspley school and the tennis court and knew that possibly some students might ride their bicycles to the court on Beams Road which was taken by the plaintiff and her friend. Sixthly, the court also considered the fact that on the day when the plaintiff met with the accident, the school advised children to choose their own way to the Coops Tennis Centre which implied that both cycling and walking were suitable means of travelling. The children were not supervised by any teacher which establishes the fact that the school failed to exercise reasonable care and breached its duty towards the plaintiff (Barry 2017). Although the first defendant contended that walking would have been a safer means than riding which would have been a sensible route for mature people in the situation of the plaintiff, but it must also be considered that the plaintiff was immature at her age and under the influence of peer pressure she agreed to ride a bicycle of a bigger size with defective braking system. In order to safeguard the children from avoidable known risks while they travelled from school to the court, it was the responsibility of the school to guide the children to walk to the court under the teachers supervision instead of riding bicycles on dangerous traffic ways. The statement of the court that the school authorities were negligent in fulfilling its duty of care is supported by the authorities relating to the obligation of school authorities, referring to Geyer v Downs Anor [1976-77] 138 CLR 81 and Williams v Eady [1893] 10 TLR 41 at p.42 which clearly defined the duty of a schoolmaster towards the students. It states that the schoolmaster was bound to exhibit care towards his boys just like a careful father would take care of his boys. Seventhly, with respect to the question whether the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence, the court stated that it was obvious for a 13 year old school girl who was used to riding bicycles to detect that the bicycle she was riding had defective brake system. The evidence suggests that the condition of the bicycle resulted partly from the collision between the bicycle of the plaintiff and her friend and partly due to the lack of experience and care on part of the plaintiff (Antieau 2016). Eighthly, the court considered the fact that the plaintiff continued to the accident spot riding her bicycle that was large and with defective brake system indicated her lack of care and maturity for her own safety. The court based this statement on the judgment observed in Lynch v Nurdin [1841] 1 QB 29 which stated that contributory negligence on part of a child refers to the failure to exercise the care that is reasonably expected form an ordinary child of the same age. Lastly, the court divided the responsibility between the first defendant and the plaintiff where the plaintiff shall borne 25 percent of the responsibility for contributory negligence and the first defendant shall be liable for 75 percent of responsibility for negligence. The plaintiff was awarded with damages under the Griffiths and Kerkemeyer head of damage. Decision of Appellant court The judgment apportioning negligence against the appellant was set aside and the plaintiff was awarded the cost of the appeal. Critical analysis of the decision The court accepted the contention made by the second defendant that the bicycle was too big for the plaintiff and seemed to be unstable or unsteady. Therefore, the court was satisfied on the fact that cause of falling off the bicycle was either the inexperience of riding on a bicycle or the default in the braking system in the bicycle of the plaintiff. Further, the court rejected the contention of the plaintiff stating that the second defendant should have stopped the vehicle when he noticed that the plaintiff seemed unsteady. This is because the plaintiff did not do anything that would have caused the second defendant to halt his vehicle before he could come in contact with the plaintiff. Furthermore, Beams road being a busy road, the second defendant had other vehicles bend him and it seems unreasonable to expect a semi trailer carrying 20 tons of paper to halt the vehicle. Moreover, there was no indication that the presence of bicycles would have led the second defendant to forese e that is vehicle would pose a danger to the plaintiff and her friend. On applying Lynchs case, the court considered that the plaintiff was 13 years old and was an intelligent girl that is evident from her school reports. The evidence suggests that plaintiff was aware of the difficulty she experienced in bicycling before she reached at the place of injury. The court concluded that the injury was the outcome of the immature and foolish conduct that resulted from the negligence on part of the first defendant. Hence, the plaintiff was partly responsible for the injury. The appellant made an appeal stating there was no contributory negligence on her part and claimed damages for the need for future care. The appellant court held that the trial judge did not provide an precise evidence as to when the appellant became aware of the defective brakes or no evidence that she knew about the defect before commencing the ride. Further the appellant held that she was able to exercise some control over the speed by using the front brake and the pedals. Furthermore, the size of the bicycle was said to have caused the injury but there is no evidence when the appellant realized that the size of the bicycle obstructed her efficient control over it. Therefore, the evidence failed to establish that a 13 year old should have detected the defect in the brake Reference List Abraham, K., 2017.The forms and functions of tort law. West Academic. Antieau, C.J., 2016. Procedural Requirements and Shared Liability.Antieau on Local Government Law, Second Edition,3. Barry, C., 2017. Statutory modifications of contributory negligence at common law.Precedent (Sydney, NSW), (140), p.12. Brake, D.L., 2014. Tortifying Retaliation: Protected Activity at the Intersection of Fault, Duty, and Causation. Chase, O.G. and Miller, H.G., 2016. Law of Negligence.New York Practice Guide: Negligence,1. Cusimano, G.S. and Roberts, M.L., 2016. Contributory Negligence and Assumption of Risk.Alabama Tort Law,1. Foley, M. and Christensen, M., 2016. Negligence and the Duty of Care: A Case Study Discussion.Singapore Nursing Journal,43(1). Geyer v Downs Anor [1976-77] 138 CLR 81 Goudkamp, J. and Nolan, D., 2016. Contributory negligence in practice. Goudkamp, J. and Nolan, D., 2017. Contributory negligence on appeal. Hill, L.L., 2015. The Litigation Privilege: Its Place in Contemporary Jurisprudence. Lynch v Nurdin [1841] 1 QB 29 Ogden, B.G. and Hylton, K.N., 2016. Incentives to Take Care Under Contributory and Comparative Fault. Ryan, C.J., Callaghan, S. and Large, M., 2015. The importance of least restrictive care: the clinical implications of a recent High Court decision on negligence.Australasian Psychiatry,23(4), pp.415-417. Spamann, H., 2016. Monetary Liability for Breach of the Duty of Care?.Journal of Legal Analysis,8(2), pp.337-373. Williams v Eady [1893] 10 TLR 41 at p.42